Saturday, April 24, 2010

The Weak on Planet Parenthood

Hello there. I'm Doctor Yobbo, from Doctor Yobbo's World of Bollocks™. Not many people realise that in 'real life', as it were, I do happen to be an actual Doctor, as well as being an actual Yobbo (my caps).

In my practice as a Doctor, Men's Health is obviously of vital importance. We have a stack of copies of the thing out in the waiting room, and if you're interested in reading about how to make yourself even more of a metrosexual softcock who loves his own reflection almost as much as he loves drinking wheatgrass juice rather than beer, eating tofu rather than red meat, and having intercourse with himself rather than pretty ladies, I would suggest Men's Health as the publication for you.

However for the rest of us, those with functional testicles, finding reliable information on how to keep all the functional bits in proper working order is far from a trivial exercise. The recent month of Mo-vember has illustrated the great amount of interest the general public have in issues surrounding men's health and wellbeing... what, you didn't know there was actually a point to everyone growing daft-looking carpet extract on their upper lip? No, it wasn't just about trying to look like 1980s cricketers - and, to be perfectly frank, most of the bumfluff cultivation attempts I have been unfortunate enough to witness over the past month have looked less like Mervyn Hughes and more like Freddie Mercury. Particularly Greg Murphy from the V8 Supercars. In my considered medical opinion, he looked like a complete arseburgler.

As my professional duty as a medical science communicator is to both inform and entertain, I have taken on the responsibility of providing a series of brief synopses of information that I would claim is essential for your average male reader, most of you being very bloody average at best, to survive and indeed thrive through important periods throughout your lifetime - watersheds, if you will. It will address issues surrounding health, wellbeing, and methodology that will permit you to function within today's sophisticated, mature, 21st century world, while still protecting your inalienable right to think, feel and act like a chauvinist bogan pisshead with a mental age of 14.

This series of lectures is entitled Dr Yobbo's Guide to Important Bloke Stuff, otherwise known as the Yobbo Survival Manifesto. Here I present Volume 1 in the series, entitled:

Preparing For Fatherhood:
If You're Reading This, You're Not Bloody Ready Yet


If at first you don't succeeed, try try again
(and get her to stand on her head afterwards)

Trying, otherwise known as 'the fun bit', usually consists of endless, sustained sessions of unprotected sex at all hours of the day or night. Naturally you should seek to make this phase last as long as possible. To that end, we offer the following tips:
  • Swap your nice airy boxers for a set of Y-fronts one or two sizes smaller than required.
  • If you ride a pushbike or motorcycle, we recommend doing so with the seat ratcheted up a few notches higher than is comfortable. And aim for bumps.
  • From a dietary perspective, coffee, alcohol and large amounts of red meat have all been shown to have a detrimental affect on the fertility and viability of sperm. So make sure you get stuck into those then.
  • If all else fails, have someone kick you repeatedly in the love spuds.
Of course, when the novelty of being shamelessly used and discarded like a stallion in stud wears off, let me know and I'll send around some of my fellow medical professionals with a fashionable velcro wrap-around jacket for you to try on. However, if eventually you DO actually want to get your partner pregnant, there's one foolproof, failsafe option: have your partner spend hundreds of dollars on pseudoscientific 'fertility supplements' from spurious mail-order outfits. Sod's Law will guarantee that she will be witnessing two lines on the piddle stick long before aforesaid package ever gets delivered.

So you're going to be a dad! Apparently. Eventually.
So you're four to eight weeks in and you've learned that you're going to be a father. For the sake of argument we're going to assume that you do intend to acknowledge that the child is yours. There are a few things you need to remember at this early stage. First of all, remember pregnancy is a marathon, not a sprint. Nine months is a long time, as any South Sydney Rabbitohs fan who's had to sit through an entire NRL season of home games can attest.

The second point we need to make is one which has to register with prospective new dads very quickly, so we'll be as clear as we can about it:

You are wrong about EVERYTHING, because you are a MAN.

Or to paraphrase: because you are a man, you are wrong about everything. That is to say, you know nothing. Your opinion is not relevant and will not be credibly valued by your partner, her family, friends, healthcare professionals, childbirth educators, random people who stop you in the street, and/or annoying salesgirls in those ridiculously massive baby paraphernalia shops. You will be marginalised, ignored, and reduced to the level of an accessory whose only role is to follow your partner around, carry the shopping bags, and of course, produce one's credit card on cue.

If you've recently been through a wedding, you should be already quite familiar with this.

Antenatal? That's so negative. Why can't it be pro-natal?
In the modern era, it is usual for first-time parents to book into antenatal classes in order to be lectured about pregnancy, childbirth and baby rearing by a smug, patronising, belittling childbirth educator who is an expert in the field, on the basis that they have done it at least once themselves and have read through Pregnancy for Dummies enough times to get a pretty piece of paper from Tech. Your childbirth educator will be a much better mother than anyone in the class, as she will demonstrate when she shamelessly one-ups the new parents who return to the class to show off their babies and talk about their experiences. These individuals are invariably members of the Breastfeeding Mafia, who seek to discredit and undermine the evil forces of the Formula Feeding Conspiracy; you will find without exception that most childbirth educators have breastfed their children to at least the age of five and a half, view this as perfectly natural, and can't quite understand why their little darlings get bullied mercilessly for being over-indulged little mummy's boys, as they should be. However, being a man, do not bother expressing any opinions whatsoever about such matters, as you, as we have observed, are wrong about EVERYTHING because you are a MAN.

The most useful resource in your antenatal class will be the other prospective parents, as many as half of which will be males such as yourself, slightly bewildered about the flood of information they're being asked to process, while also starting to get just a little bit dicked off with being belittled every time they ask a reasonable question. Our tip is to buddy up with your fellow bogans. They'll quickly identify themselves as they'll be the ones copping most of the patronising invective from the childbirth educator, other than yourself of course. The main reason to buddy up with these fellows is because in the near future, you'll need someone to take up golf with, as all new fathers are obliged to do. Studies have shown that 93% of all golfers picked up the habit as a means of getting the Jesus suffering fuck out of the house and away from the screaming shitfight that constitutes their household on a Saturday morning. Then again 68% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

Finally, we would emphasise that despite the likelihood that you will be surrounded by a dozen or so abundantly fertile women at the height of their reproductive prime, it is generally not appropriate to use your antenatal class as a place to check out other chicks. Nor is it wise to get their phone numbers 'just in case it doesn't work out with this guy'.

The Adventures of the Incredible Self-Inflating Woman
Like garage clutter and the latter years of Marlon Brando, your partner will soon expand to entirely fill the space available, and then some. She will be said to be 'glowing', largely because she will be always about three degrees away from a complete thermonuclear meltdown. She is likely to be very sensitive about her distended shape, which will not exactly be helped by every second person stopping her in the street to buoyantly tell her how absolutely HUUUUUGGGE she looks, in a way that even Darrell Eastlake would consider over the top. These comments are well-meant, but will inevitably cause your partner anguish. The correct response to such comments is as follows: 'Wow, thanks, and you've got a head like a smacked arse, you fat fucking cow!' Then gob on them.

Towards the end of her pregnancy, your partner may despair that she's 'as big as a house'. The only response to this which is reassuring while still retaining credibility is to say that she's definitely not larger than a house. Maybe a doll's house. Certainly no larger than Hawaiian Tropic Barbie's Maui Beach Shack™. If you play your cards right, your favourite little doll will be most flattered and reassured, and old Ken might get to park his pink Ferrari in Barbie's garage, if you know what I mean, and as a medical professional, I think you do.

Weird shit
Pregnancy causes otherwise rational people to do some rather peculiar things. There is a roaring trade in expectant mothers getting casts of their pregnant bellies. To use for what useful purposes, one wonders? To smuggle beer into the cricket? Likewise, some new parents, clearly delusional from weeks of broken sleep, have made the decision to have casts of the little one's tiny feet and hands made, to be sprayed in gold paint and displayed in a case, with the result being somewhat reminiscent of one of Fat Bastard's hunting trophies.

Our advice: save your money. You're going to need it. Because...

Everything is more expensive than everything else
It has been scientifically proven that a nine-pound baby of approximate dimensions 500mm x 200mm x 200mm will cause your house to fill beyond bursting capacity with complete and utter garbage, much of it pastel-coloured, made of inferior-grade plastic and hideously overpriced, and your car to 'morph' from the nimble sports hatchback or V8 utility you thought you owned into a beige Volvo station wagon or a hulking great 4WD with a Labrador in the back. The monolithic, sinister, billion-dollar baby products industry (often referred to as Big Baby) have made endless fortunes on the back of exploiting the fears and insecurities of first-time parents, and the markups seen here are greater than anywhere short of a US defence contract. A point to consider: your own parents are highly unlikely to have had at their disposal a CIA-specification covert surveillance system set up to watch you sleep, incorporating a body heat sensor, four CCTV cameras and a 98dB alarm which goes off on a four second rota should the baby not move for more than five minutes. Oddly enough, you are not dead. Take this information and use it as you wish.

Some items are, of course, essential, and through the purchase of these items you will learn and discover much about economics and market forces. At your local nursery furniture superstore you will discover how much can be charged, with a completely straight face, for a series of MDF planks with wood veneer on them. Likewise a new baby will need to be clothed, and you will learn that the rule with baby clothes is broadly the same as that for Japanese consumer electronics: the smaller it is, the more expensive it is. Alternatively, you could buy pre-loved baby clothes on eBay or TradeMe. The perceived disadvantage of such clothes, leveraged by Big Baby companies, is that the effluent from someone else's baby has almost definitely erupted all over them at some stage in the past. However, these clothes will equally definitely be erupted all over again shortly after your baby is inserted into them, regardless of whether the clothes are new or otherwise. The advantage of second-hand clothes, by contrast, is that they've already proved they can stand up to being vommed on. They've been vommed on before, they will get vommed on again; maybe by your baby, maybe by someone else's. The eternal cycle of vom turns once more.

The Loch Nest Monster
Big Baby's commercial calling card is to prey upon the nesting instinct of the expectant mother. Do not, repeat NOT, underestimate this instinct. It is backed by stronger hormones than even Ben Johnson was on. Likewise, it is not wise to point out that the nesting instinct that drives them to start buying newborn nappies by three months, to spend the following six months on the internet looking for second-hand baby clothes, and to order the baby's room be stripped, repainted and filled to capacity with designer nursery furniture long before the 30 week scan, is basically driven by hormones; and furthermore that if men followed every hormonal impulse they were driven by, you'd be out bonking Schoolies chicks in bulk rather than standing here in Babies 'R' Us trying to work out how a bunch of scaffolding tubes and a couple of knobbly mini-BMX wheels constitutes a high-tech all-terrain baby buggy worth nine hundred and fifty dollars.

The name game
This is how naming your child works: she will come up with a series of names, and you will tell her why they are all bloody awful. Then she will throw something at you.

This is caused by the fact that women generally choose baby names based on how pretty they sound, whereas men choose names based on the probability of the name in question causing the kid to have seven flavours of shite beaten out of them at school on the basis that the name is either (a) astonishingly ghey or (b) can so easily be corrupted into a demoralising sledge that it'd be impossible NOT to use it. Special mention here must go to the parents of former NSW Gaming and Racing Minister, the right honourable Richard Face. For bravery, if nothing else.

Total bullshit, and how to deal with it
Now this column is called the World of Bollocks, and as a prospective new parent, you'll be hearing more than a reasonable quantity of same. Babies are this. Babies are that. Babies are nice with fava beans and a nice chianti. On a related topic, despite anything he tells you, do not seek the advice of anyone called Dr Lecter. He is NOT an accredited paediatrician.

Most of the 'helpful advice' you will hear can be classified as old wives' tales. You can defend against having to hear these sorts of stories by encouraging your partner to hang out with younger chicks rather than old wives. At the very least, this should provide you with some available options should everything go pear-shaped.

Two particularly dubious pieces of accepted wisdom are worth exploring in greater detail, one of which is the concept of the 'due date'. The most common question you and your partner will get, other than 'Are you sure he's ready to be a father?' will be 'When are you due?' To which you'll inevitably quote the exact date your lead maternity caregiver has provided you with, as you were obliged to do when your partner was making her request for maternity leave from her employer and in numerous other situations. Indeed, the entire premise of pregnancy rests on the validity of the due date. Which is a bit of a problem, as the due date is completely ignored by the most important participant in the process, your little mate up the duff, approximately 96% of the time. Statistically, it's no more likely that the Bump will turn up on the so-called 'due date' as they are on any day out of a 24 day period spanning it. And that's not even part of the 68% of statistics that are made up on the spot. So instead, when someone asks you when your baby is due, it is entirely appropriate to merely narrow it down to either football or cricket season.

The other old chestnut requiring a definitive roasting is that relating to pregnant women suddenly transmogrifying into insatiable nymphomaniacs who simply can't get enough. This is an old ruse that has been perpetuated for years by women desperately trying to get their male partners enthusiastic about pregnancy. This is a myth. The revelation that this is a myth will likely disappoint those of you who get off on the idea of having sex with pregnant women. You people are sick motherfuckers (literally) and I for one would not be queuing up to buy you a beer.

You are wrong about EVERYTHING because you are a man.
Just a reminder, in case you'd forgotten.

Birth: not just a movie where Nicole Kidman plays a child molester
To use the vernacular, let us cut, pray, to the chase. You WILL be there. You won't want to be, but you will. You will be there knowing that you will almost definitely see things which you'll never be able to wipe from your subconscious, things that will colour your view of your partner and your child forever more, but given that this is the 21st century, your chances of escape are nil. Maybe you should have been in the generation before, where they waited downstairs, or just went to the pub. Indeed, there is a movement gathering strength in the UK for a return to such practices, due to the alarming number of new fathers presenting clinically with psychological conditions alarmingly similar to battlefield post-traumatic stress disorder, as a result of watching their partners give birth. It seems they're very intelligent and perceptive over there, disregarding of course Wayne Rooney.

For a further UK-based comment on the topic, you need go no further than Scotland (technically part of the UK) to that great hairy-arsed Glaswegian philosopher Billy Connolly, who put it quite plainly:
DON'T GO.
It is NOT a spectator sport.
So, all that said, if you do choose to walk through through the gates of hell, don't attempt to protest that you weren't sufficiently warned, like some birthing suite version of Shoaib Akhtar. For what you will bear witness to will be some twenty to thirty-six hours of screaming, swearing, crying, personal abuse, blood, excrement, effluvia, adult themes, drug use and the use of sharp pointy metallic objects in terrifyingly close proximity to your beloved's most vulnerable areas, somewhat reminiscent of a cross between Hostel and a German porn movie gone wrong. Then again, that statement would presume German porn movies ever go right.

Clearly, birth is something a man should only ever need to see once in his lifetime, regardless of the number of children he fathers; the point that all men are bastards, as well as being wrong about EVERYTHING etc, is made on a single viewing. Why most antenatal classes choose to play videos of other people's births, like a snuff film played backwards, remains beyond the comprehension of this medical professional (I did mention I am a medical professional did I not? Anyway, I am.) Why on God's green Earth do they show these dreadful films to prospective parents? Do they show Wolf Creek to English backpackers on outback tour buses? I would hazard a guess that they do not.

We close this discussion with a handy hint. If the worst occurs in the birthing suite and a Caesarean is called for (so named because they cover the baby with lettuce, parmesan, bacon, croutons and dressing), it is politic to heavily suggest that your understanding is that epidurals are often not enough to mask the pain of what is indeed major invasive surgery, and you fear that a general anaesthetic is really the only safe and humane option. As the only non-hysterical person in the room, your opinion will have more weight than your partner with the only individuals in the entire pregnancy oeuvre who will listen to the opinion of a man - the obstetrician and the anesthetist, who will both be men. Then, once your partner is safely 'under', go to the pub. Make sure you have them 'text' you before she wakes up, however, or you will be very much in the poo. As you may have been anyway, as statistics show 90% of labours result at some point in an involuntary 'dookie'. That was not part of the 68% of made-up stuff; I got it from Scrubs.

Do not attempt this at home, or anywhere else
For those of you who would consider themselves sensitive new age metrosexuals, we would simply proffer the the words of the great Australian fast bowler from Skithouse: 'Don't be a poofter'. In other words, man up. The following is a list of things that, under the pressure of expectancy, you may feel you should do, with reasons why you really shouldn't.
  • Do not say, whether out of 'solidarity' or any other form of presumed kinship with your partner, that you will voluntarily give up coffee, alcohol, amphetamines or any other thoroughly enjoyable pastime which is considered a no-no for your pregnant partner. This is patent insanity. By the same logic, you would be waddling off to the slashers five times a night, you would be compelled to maximise your credit card with utterly superfluous trinkets and gadgetry, and you would be getting three months' paid leave from your workplace...
    Hang on a minute, there may be something to this after all.
  • Do not, under any circumstances, make the preposterous claim that you 'feel her pain'. You do not. Try carrying a watermelon around up your jumper for nine months until it gives you scoliosis, and then as a grand finale, attempt to squeeze it out through your arsehole.
    Oh you have? Ah well, never mind. What happens on rugby tours stays on rugby tours.
  • Finally, do not, I repeat NOT, film the birth. Seriously, who the fuck is going to want to watch that?
    German people don't count.

The end, and afterwards
Congratulations, you are a father. The horror (sorry, the wonder) of birth is complete. Now you need merely face the horror of three to six months of absolutely no fucking sleep whatsoever.

Good luck with that then.

However, when you're faced with that tiny, smiling, squinting face, looking up at you with adoring eyes, all the pain, anguish, expense and frustration that led to this point will be worth it.

Apparently.


The kids are alright. It's the OH&S nimrods you need to worry about
There are many, many reasons why being a kid today is palpably more shit than it was in my day, or in your day, or in your old man's day, or in pretty much any day you could name that wasn't the Industrial Revolution when being a kid largely involved being sent down t' pit for tuppence a millennia with nowt to eat but a cup of cold sick with a pube in it and when we came home after 25 1/2 hour shift to hole in t' road with wet newspaper over't we had to lick road clean wi' tongue and our Dad would thrash us to death with a broken bottle etc etc etc.

That minor discomfort aside, being a kid now sucks more than at any stage in the past fifty years. Because people are always THINKING about you. 'Oh won't somebody think of the children?' will howl a veritable battalion of pious screeching mavens, and yet that's all people - punishing, straightening, gimlet-eyed anti-fun people - seem to be able to do. Kids these days might get iPods and designer smack but they also have to put up with milquetoast bullshit the likes of which had never even been heard of ten years ago. Time out. Naughty steps. Peanut allergies. Jesus Christ, whatever happened to sorting out your differences behind the bike shed and still having time to get in a quick game of backyard tackle footy before Mum saw the state of your school gear and kicked your arse from here to Christmas.

Eventually, though, things reach a tipping point. Eventually, society reaches a Rubicon, a point beyond which there can be no turning back.

People of the World (of Bollocks), we have reached that sorry, sick day. We have reached that point of no return. And it is called Springfree™.


Designed by gimlet-eyed God-bothering Cantab fun police, Springfree claims to be the world's first springless trampoline, and as such, the world's first completely safe trampoline. No rusty springs, no rotting eyelet hooks, no exposed bare steel frame. Netting to catch the offspring before they spring off. Padding on every available surface. In short, no possible way for your darling little angels to hurt themselves in any way, lest they take in the Nerf bats and try to go each other UFC styles.

I think you can see where I'm going here.

WHAT

THE FUCK

IS THE

FUCKING

POINT

OF THAT.

This thing absolutely fucking horrifies me on multiple levels, two of which I'd like to shout at you about here. The first is the most obvious, to me at least. And it's a serious point. If kids can't hurt themselves, how the hell are they meant to learn what's safe and what's not?

Busted, rusted, verging-on-collapse trampolines - of which there was one in every Australian backyard by some form of legislative writ possibly dating back to Hawkey's first term, or maybe even No Pants Fraser - taught the nation's youngsters a lot of very valuable lessons. Primarily about risk assessment, hazard mitigation and accident avoidance. Just as sure as you knew not to ride your bike off stormwater drains because it'd cause you significant injury, or into the surf at the beach because your dad would, you knew, because you learned pretty quickly, what not to do on a trampoline. You KNEW not to bounce on the sides because you'd fly off into the paperbark trees. You KNEW to stay away from the springs, because down that path lay significant groinal trauma, and detaching one's prepubescent scrotum from a partially distended trampoline spring is not an experience that one should need to take into adolescence with them. You KNEW to stop doing drop-in bombs off the overhanging tree-branch after reaching your teens because touching down on the bricks underneath is not the kind of surprise your kidneys like to have. You KNEW not to look up the dress of your older cousin's cute best friend when she came over for a bounce during Xmas hols, because you'd get slapped, regardless of whether it was totally worth it or not, which it was. And you KNEW not to double-bounce your little brother into the stratosphere such that on his return to Earth he plummetted into the frame head-first, because claret would ensue, and you'd inevitably get unfairly blamed for his lack of spatial awareness, and/or consciousness.

In short, you knew how to identify hazards in your environment - like your parents, after pitching your bro into the undergrowth - and mitigate them - by running the fuck away and hiding at your mate's place. How the hell are kids going to get that sort of real-life training with this confection of unmitigated arse? Make no mistake, people, Springfree is child abuse. It's sending your children out into the world without the proper training, instruction or experience to deal with it. The real world isn't fucking 'Springfree', people. If it was a trampoline, it'd be a rotted old piece of shite with no pads, a collapsing frame, and rusty springs laced with tetanus, scrapie and TEH AIDS. That's right, parents. Buying this unmitigated pile of driftnet-lined arse is akin to INJECTING YOUR CHILDREN DIRECTLY WITH THE HIV-1 VIRUS.

I don't know about you, but that doesn't sound like responsible parenting to me.

But secondly, and far more importantly... I don't see how the fuck anyone is supposed to use this bastardized whitebait net for the most important role the backyard trampoline is pressed into, later in its life, as the kids start growing into teens and the grass starts growing around the long-abandoned frame-base of the tramp. That is, as backstop and automatic wickie for the all important World Series of Backyard Cricket. Every backyard cricketer knows that if personnel are limiting, you don't waste fielders on wicket-keeping. It's a shit gig anyway, standing at the back and collecting all the crap other people miss. You're telling me the goalkeepers in football get all the roots? No. Any gig where you can be replaced by a wall, a garage door, your Mum's camellias or, as world's best practice, an old rectangular trampoline tipped on its side and offset slightly from the stumps to account for right-handers batting on off stump (which, being a wheelie bin, was technically also middle and leg), is a pointless and thankless gig not worth doing by anyone. Even Gilly. Even Havock.

And yet these child abusers from C*nterbury Uni want to take that experience away from kids, and force them to crouch ad nauseum over a stinking wheelie bin in the middle of summer, miserably watching and waiting as their ex-grade cricketer mate tonks their other ex-grade mate's appalling excuse for leg spin over cow corner and into the neighbours' veggie patch.

To which there is only one rational response.

Set fire to the Springfree factory. The address is on their website.

Better burn down C*nterbury Uni as well, just to be certain.

The Doctor (I AM a Doctor you know) is OUT.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

The Weak in Eats

Hello folks. Continuing our countdown to our 300th post, the World of Bollocks presents: The Weak In Eats, our Culinary Special. Less molecular gastronomy and more bucket chemistry.

__________________

I'd like to talk to you today about something very close to my heart. In that it's something that is probably making the artery walls of my heart closer together than they used to be. It's called bacon, and along with beer, big fuck-off motorbikes and bi-curious amateur girls with big boobies, is among my very favourite things in the entire universe. Pity you can't combine any more than three of them at once without the potential for disaster, or at least a mess that's not coming out of the living room carpet without a heavy duty can of Shake-N-Vac.

I have a theory, ladies and gentlemen, about bacon which I'd like to share with you. My hypothesis is this; that bacon is, in fact, man chocolate. I'll rephrase that before you puerile idiots start sniggering. Bacon is to man as chocolate is to The Ladies. That whole deal of obsessing over chocolate, gormlessly and fatuously declaring oneself to be a 'chocoholic', compulsively gorging on the stuff at Certain Times Of The Month (i.e any day with 'day' in the day) - yeah, well I have that for bacon, the prince of foods, the snack food of champions. Bacon can complement breakfast, lunch, dinner, dessert and can even provide sterling service as a condiment. There is indeed no meal to which bacon cannot 'add value', and anyone who disagrees is either vegirrelevant, or possesses ovaries. Either way: your input is Not Mission Critical.


Actually, that position, while defendable, is not entirely enlightened, and I have become aware of bacon-curious ladies who are beginning to see my way of thinking. A fellow researcher was stopped at the lights (yes we have them one the Riviera of the Antarctic) on her way to work one recent morning. And through her window, suddenly and randomly, was lobbed... a bacon buttie! Hallelujah! Manna from heaven! Or more accurately, manna from a promo girl from the Rock FM station, whose marketing department is either very, very clever or very, very stoned. I presume she was aiming for the preset on our correspondent's car stereo. In any case, this is the Greatest Radio Station Promotion EVAAAARRRRR, and has resulted in me driving aimlessly around and between any and all traffic-lighted intersections in the local area at morning peak fifteen-minutes, hoping against hope that I'll come across a girl in a tight-fitting The Rock T-shirt and jeans who'll sidle over to my car in the fleeting opportune moments afforded by the red, with a promising smile, and offer me a taste of her bacon sandwich.

I'm not sure that came out right.

Anyhoo, as a cultural attache of note and an internationalist of repute, I can tell you that from my extensive research on the topic, bacon is different over here. It's wetter. Strayan bacon is more stringently cured than Kiwi bacon, ending up saltier, drier and crisper. And, obviously, better. But one must make do as best one can when one is overusing one as a term of reference for oneself. And bacon is bacon, and bacon is good. Whether in an authentic Italian carbonara (no cream, you backward-arsed heathens), paired in the holy burger trinity of chicken and avocado, bewilderingly smothered in maple syrup and condimented onto pancakes by Canadians, casually slapped into a Bacon & Egg McArse by a spotty prepubescent (and why the fuck do they need 15 minutes to do so these days? Bring back the fucking warning trays Ronald, you smug-faced twunt) or just chopped up real fine, doused in soy and grilled with oysters kilpatrick, either as an aphrodisiac or a purgative depending on the allergy status of your intended, bacon is all the pork you'll ever need on your fork.

'Vegetarian bacon', though, that's fuckin' crook. That shit needs outlawing.

__________________

The publicity ploy of renaming unpleasant shit to make it sound more appealing, saleable or palatable has been around for years, but has accelerated exponentially in the last image-obsessed, marketing-infested decade or so. ‘Friendly fire’ was coined by some Army PR type for being blowed the fuck up by the Seppos. ‘Market correction’ is the euphemism for your parents losing three quarters of their super because some speculationary stockbroking twunt and his day-trading arsewit mates couldn’t keep it trousered. And then there’s ‘family-friendly’, as in the political mindset of redneck, racist, homo-hating uber-Christian fucktards.

But now, the gold standard for changing the semantics to fit the purpose. However astonishingly, amazingly, car-crash-stupefyingly misguided.

I give you... the PETA ‘Save the Sea Kittens’ campaign.


I think only taking a look for yourself will truly do this site justice, and explainify the thesis behind this particular bit of intellectual genius. However, perhaps their ‘About the campaign’ screed might give you a clue:

People don't seem to like fish. They're slithery and slimy, and they have eyes on either side of their pointy little heads — which is weird, to say the least. Plus, the small ones nibble at your feet when you're swimming, and the big ones — well, the big ones will bite your face off if Jaws is anything to go by.

Of course, if you look at it another way, what all this really means is that fish need to fire their PR guy — stat. Whoever was in charge of creating a positive image for fish needs to go right back to working on the Britney Spears account and leave our scaly little friends alone. You've done enough damage, buddy. We've got it from here. And we're going to start by retiring the old name for good. When your name can also be used as a verb that means driving a hook through your head, it's time for a serious image makeover. And who could possibly want to put a hook through a sea kitten?

Ask the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to stop promoting sea kitten hunting here.

No, they’re not taking the piss. No, it’s not a hoax site set up by the Chaser or the Yes Men. They’re serious. They’re not fish, they’re ‘sea kittens’. And we need to stop hunting and killing them with big scary hooks because it hurts their feelings. And presumably their mouths too.

If your jaw didn’t drop and a wordless ‘Oh for fuck’s sake’ whisper from your slackened lips, best you shut this complicated looking ‘puter down and go do something more in line with your powers of ideological reasoning and your level of intellectual competence. Turning the letters on ‘Wheel of Fortune’ might be about it.

And as for PETA... Jesus fucking Christ. All I can recommend for this august body is that perhaps it should just stick to its core business. Encouraging easily misled ‘politically aware’ twiglet actresses into nuding up in public.


__________________

From our 'Oh for fuck's sake' file...

The Britpop civil war of the '90s has finally reached armistice. Peace has been declared. Where once pitched battles raged across the stages and the pages of the British music industry, there is now rapproachment between the two warring tribes of Britpop, between those who follow the Mancunian Brothers Gallagher and those who set their star by that floppy haired tweek who went on to sing for Gorillaz. Oasis versus Blur, people. Get with the program.

Anyway, as some old dead fucker from Liverpool once wrote, war is over. And the peacemaker? Not a fairly shit action flick with George Clooney and a dubiously un-ginga Nicole Kidman (why did the last 10 minutes on the big nuke timer go for twenty on-screen?) but... cheese.

Our story begins with former Blur bass player Alex James who has packed in the London celebrity gig and fucked off to the sticks. He lives in a house (a very big house) in the country, doesn't drink smoke laugh takes herbal baths in the country... Sorry. Anyway he's got a farm in the Cotswolds and makes cheese. Not dick cheese either, the proper stuff.

And it seems, if Sources Close To The Band (i.e. some cunt from the NME who made this shit up) are accurate, cheese was the glue that held Blur together for so long. "Cheese was the glue that held Blur together so long," A Friend was quoted as saying. "Damon (Albarn, aforementioned tweek) and Alex (James) have always been enthusiastic about cheese. But it wasn't until recently that Alex discovered Liam (Gallagher) and Noel (Where's me fruit platteh) shared their obsession." Who this Friend Of The Band is, other than a tedious name-dropping arsetard, remains a mystery, but pretty safe to say it's not Graham (Coxon), former guitarist for Blur, who is still of the opinion that Damon (Albarn) and Alex (James) are a pair of (fuck)wits. Oasis, for their part, are no strangers to producing their own cheese (insert Be Here Now joke here, pause for editing.)


Anyway Farmer James has invited Albarn and the Gallaghers up to his cheese factory to jointly develop a special edition cheese for the upcoming BRIT awards. James, whose life has transitioned completely from hard drugs to soft cheese, has remarked, "It's amazing, the friends you can make, just through cheese. People get very emotional about it!"

Maybe not a complete transition away from the 'hard drugs' side of the ledger then methinks? Someone tell him to stop mainlining the Gruyere.

__________________

For as long as humans have walked the Earth, there have been other humans absolutely gagging with evangelical fervour to tell them exactly how to live their lives, and to punish them relentlessly if they fail to comply. Fundamentalist religion has lead the charge for compulsory self-improvement by force, from the Crusades, the missionaries and the Spanish Inquisition of years gone, to Hillsong, World Youth Day and World Vision - sanctimonious twunts getting their jollies from directing others how to live their lives, largely because they get no enjoyment from the way they live their own. Through the years fundamentalism has worn many faces, each of them uglier than Kyle Sandilands and equally as morally reprehensible. However the new fundamentalism is not Islam, nor corporatization and globalization, but the twin pillars of health-and-safety nazidom and environ-mentalist-ness. OH&S is the new church, the National Health and Medical Research Council the new deity, and you will worship. All over the crystal bucket, be it the news or an endless barrage of reality TV effluent, self-appointed guardians of humanity are telling us what not to eat, what not to spend our money on, what suburbs not to buy in, and even what not to wear - and the latter from a haggard pair of skeletal mavens you wouldn't root for practice.


And you can already hear the deafening chorus of self-righteous green-gilled arsewits craving the coming apocalyptic clusterfuck of high fuel prices, high food prices, credit crunchy goodness and global warming just so they can wheedle out a half-mongrel over the experience of lecturing the rest of us that THIS IS ALL OUR FAULT for driving cars, flying on planes, using electricity and breathing air, and not joining them over in the corner munching on soylent tofu bran-snacks, plaiting their armpit hair and wondering why they haven't scored a shag in four and a half years. The most miserable part about it is that unlike the fundamentalist Godbotherers, there is the sliver of truth to what this lot have to say; the world is in a bit of a state, and it's proving difficult to pin the fuck-up on anyone but ourselves (or at least our parents'.) But they still don't have to be so fucking smug about saying it, because making someone else's life miserable merely for enjoying themselves more than you do is what we like to call in the trade a Cunt's Act.

Anyway. Health gimboids in white coats ahoy - and these jokers are particularly embarrassing for anyone in the world of research, because one utterly clueless press release declaring 'meat is murder' - which must therefore follow, as Tony Martin once pointed out, that yoghurt must be burglary - and everyone stops thinking 'Scientists, hey. They're clever, in touch and relevant, they deserve much more money' and starts remembering 'Scientists. They were the snotty little nerdlingers at school who we used to beat eight grades of shite out of, and apparently justifiably so.' The cringe factor remains persistent, from one of ours (unfortunately) at Otago's Wellington campus who declared that the only way to decrease NZ's above-average rate of salmonella and campylobacter food poisoning was to ban the sale of fresh chicken - which would have really impressed the multi-million dollar poultry industry, not to mention the number of the Ingham brothers' race horses who would go short of a feed - to the self-promoting media-tart head of the NHMRC who decided amongst himself to redefine four standard drinks in a session as binge drinking. A session being any timespan of unlimited duration, including presumably one person's entire life (that one person possibly being K-Rudd's.)

The latest evangelical plot-evader to grace the media spotlight is Dr Bruce Neal of the George Institute for International Health in Sydney, who presumably share premises with the Ponds Institute and the Ministry of Fucking Cretinous Decision Making (who I understand are a NSW state government body.) He's declared the humble Aussie snag sanger to be a VIRTUAL TIME BOMB JUST WAITING TO GO OFF. AS VIRTUAL TIME BOMBS DO. OR AS ACTUAL TIME BOMBS DO, WHEREAS VIRTUAL ONES PROBABLY ONLY DO IN A VIRTUAL SENSE. I THINK HE CAN STOP SHOUTING NOW. It's not just the fat, salt, sawdust and processed animal-extract badness of the snag itself, but the salt and sugar in the tom sauce, the lack of fibre in the invariably white bread, and the carcinogenicity of the barbequing process as well. Anyone who eats a sausage sandwich will DIE SOONER than anyone who doesn't. FACT. Cue wailing and gnashing of teeth, and the instant prohibition of any butcher, supermarket or delicatessen selling any form of high-fat, high-salt cylinder of offal, in a synthetic lining or otherwise. Won't someone think of the children, etc.

Thanks. For. That. Your point being?

Neal's barrow-of-choice becomes pushing well obvious when you read the final quote: "The government now needs to make salt a national health priority and lead negotiations on maximum salt targets for different products," said Dr Neal, who chairs the Australian Division of World Action on Salt and Health. Translation: I am The Salt Guy. I want to be as famous as fuck. I want food producers to cower in fear at the mention of my name. I want governments to give me money to do research into things I've already decided the results of so I can continue to barrage people about how sick and dead they will be if they don't LISTEN TO ME GODDAMMIT. I am The Salt Guy, and I will keep pushing my barrow until the fucking wheels fall off. Or until it rusts. (See what I did there?)

There can't be a human alive who seriously doubts sausages aren't the best for your health. In their lowest-common-denominator form, the generic supermarket snag, they are seriously toxic, more flour than offal. But there equally can't be a human alive who, having figured this out, is prepared to take this information in hand when choosing to consume sausages. And such individuals don't need nosy medico-fucktards-by-appointment to help them distinguish their arse from their elbow, given they themselves would struggle without the illustrated edition of Gray's Anatomy. (I HAVE spelt that right, you soapie watching twunts; the medical text is by Gray, the soapie writers had to change the name because they couldn't get the rights. At which point they should have quietly dropped the idea.) To paraphrase (i.e. utterly misquote) Denis Leary, excess salt and fat will shorten your life by years, but they're the crappy, incontinent, senile, doddering, colostomy-bag years at the end, so who gives a flying fuck? Given that thanks to little Johnny we all have to pay for our own health care, it's not as if the do-gooders can argue they're being sanctimonious for the good of the nation. Too much salt? Too much fat? Evolution wouldn't have made us find them both so damn tasty if they weren't essential for life. Argue against sausages and you argue against evolution, you argue against science, and you argue in favour of Intelligent Design, Southern Baptists, black slavery, breeding with your relatives and playing the banjo with your toes. And that IS a FACT.

The most cretinous argument of all, though, is that we should ban the sausage because highly agriculturalized meat production causes global warming, and that makes the Earth sad. Boo hoo. According to some stat that a vegan plonker pulled out of their arse on JB's blog, 18% of our carbon dioxide emissions are from meat production. On top of the cars YOU drive, the planes YOU catch, the power YOU use et al, the meat YOU eat (and WE of course don't) is causing global warming.

Jesus suffering fuck.

This just in: LIFE causes global warming. It also causes cancer, acid rain, Parkinsons, the global credit crunch, the breakdown of the nuclear family, the cost of iPhone 3G call plans, gout, tennis elbow, Coro Drive traffic, Phillip Ruddock, the inability of the All Blacks to kick drop goals under pressure, tinea, Starbucks and the clap. If you want to feel personally responsible for any or all of that, feel free. If you want to try and make ME, any of US, or any of our fellow sausage lovers (hmmm, I don't think that came out right) feel personally responsible, you've picked the wrong target demographic for unloading your guilt trip. In short, anyone standing between Dr Yobbo and a tasty snag in bread can take their 18 percent CO2 and find an appropriate place to sequester it.

And more to the point, despite these unfounded communist gutter-press allegations of Australia being the most obese nation in the history of lard, how often do you see Aussie kiddies winning the big fat events at the Olympics? Weightlifting's never been the same since Dean Lukin tested positive. For that matter, when was the last time the Wallaby scrum had a set of gigantic front-row lardos to strike genuine fear and loathing into the heart of the Bok, the (All) Black or the Pommy Bastard? As a nation, Australia is still yet to produce a decent hammer-thrower, NFL linebacker, caber-tosser, or even one of those fat bastard roid-merchants from the 'World's Strongest Man' on ESPN. Even our Gladiators look underfed and a bit mangy compared to the steroidal-cattle-fed Seppo variety.

Bollocks to the medi-nazis. We're not nearly fat ENOUGH.

Think of the children indeed! What kind of role models are we leaving for our kids to emulate? Our nation's sporting heroes of the past weekend are (a) Tour de France leader Cadel Evans, an anorexic whippet in lycra; and (b) German MotoGP winner Casey Stoner, a small boy with prepubescent bumfluff who appears to have fucked off off on his old man's motorbike for a burn around the farm. Where's the AIS when you need them to churn out Australia's next generation of genuinely obese sporting superstars? To be frank, it's time the Institute - only marginally more credible than the the George and the Ponds - hurled their precious Sustain into the skip and replaced it with the breakfast of champions - some form of animal extract fried in lard. With chips.


So say it loud and say it proud: SAUSAGE ON my friends. For the good of the medal count in London 2012, if nothing else...


The Doctor is OUT.

PS Get in while you can to Walters Butchery in Maclean to get into the finest sausages in the land, because it can't be long before old Sid hangs up the butchers' stripes and/or drops off the twig. And into the mincer, presumably.

Thursday, April 08, 2010

The Weak In SCIENTS

Hello folks. Dr Yobbo's World of Bollocks, aka The Weak In Sport (about a thousand years ago) is nearing the triple century of posts and in honour thereof, we'll be revisiting some of the more gold-plated moments of comedic effuvience that the last five years of untrammelled arsebilge have seen fit to provide. We begin with The Weak In SCIENTS, a grab bag of offcuts and shite related to musings on the Life Scientifique, as lived, loved and freshly abandoned by Your Correspondent.

We begin with a gratuitous shot of that poundworthy ranga from Mythbusters in a lab coat and bugger-all else as some sort of flimsy scientific segue into...















RESEARCH AND DESTROY
Dr Yobbo's Review Of The Scientific Literature
Yes it's time for you lot of knuckle-dragging Luddites to get yourself edumacated with our bluffer's guide to the latest groundbreaking findings in the world of research. If you're more likely to listen to Dr Phil over Dr Karl, think New Scientist is about the methodology involved in brewing generic lager or that Scientific American is nothing more than an oxymoron (which it is), you need to sit up straight, stop playing with what ever that is, and pay attention.

This may well be crap, but it's award-winning crap
No, not Silverchair's Young Modern, but the various bids for scientific immortality that were appropriately celebrated on science's award night of nights, the annual Ig Nobel Prize announcements. Described by Nature as 'arguably the highlight of the scientific calendar' (in the same way that Willie Mason is 'arguably' the most intelligent man ever to play rugby league), the Ig Nobels like their less prestigious Scandinavian knock-offs are awarded in a range of categories, by the editors of the august and learned journal of scientific endeavour, Annals of Improbable Research. This year's awards, the 17th First Annual Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony, saw the following researchers canonised for their contributions to their respective fields:

MEDICINE
Brian Witcombe of Gloucester, UK, and Dan Meyer of Antioch, Tennessee, USA, for their penetrating medical report "Sword Swallowing and Its Side Effects." Most of which being a lot of interesting questions being asked at airport metal detectors. "Sorry officer, must be something I ate."
"Sword Swallowing and Its Side Effects," B. Witcombe and D. Meyer, British Medical Journal, December 23, 2006, vol. 333, pp. 1285-7.

PHYSICS
L. Mahadevan of Harvard University, USA, and Enrique Cerda Villablanca of Universidad de Santiago de Chile, for studying how bedsheets become wrinkled. Primarily by sleeping on them, you half-arsed Chilean fruit loops.
"Wrinkling of an Elastic Sheet Under Tension," E. Cerda, K. Ravi-Chandar, L. Mahadevan, Nature, vol. 419, October 10, 2002, pp. 579-80.
"Geometry and Physics of Wrinkling," E. Cerda and L. Mahadevan, Physical Review Letters, fol. 90, no. 7, February 21, 2003, pp. 074302/1-4.
"Elements of Draping," E. Cerda, L. Mahadevan and J. Passini, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 101, no. 7, 2004, pp. 1806-10.

BIOLOGY
Professor Johanna van Bronswijk of Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands, for her compulsion regarding counting and classifying all the mites, insects, spiders, pseudoscorpions, crustaceans, bacteria, algae, ferns and fungi found in bedding and mattresses. She strikes one as being just a tad on the OCD side of the ledger and would probably make for a really punishing one-night stand, so be warned next time you're off-chops at a dust mite research conference.
"Huis, Bed en Beestjes" [House, Bed and Bugs], J.E.M.H. van Bronswijk, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, vol. 116, no. 20, May 13, 1972, pp. 825-31.
"Het Stof, de Mijten en het Bed" [Dust, Mites and Bedding]. J.E.M.H. van Bronswijk Vakblad voor Biologen, vol. 53, no. 2, 1973, pp. 22-5.
"Autotrophic Organisms in Mattress Dust in the Netherlands," B. van de Lustgraaf, J.H.H.M. Klerkx, J.E.M.H. van Bronswijk, Acta Botanica Neerlandica, vol. 27, no. 2, 1978, pp 125-8.
"A Bed Ecosystem," J.E.M.H. van Bronswijk, Lecture Abstracts -- 1st Benelux Congress of Zoology, Leuven, November 4-5, 1994, p. 36.

CHEMISTRY
Mayu Yamamoto of the International Medical Center of Japan, developed a way to extract vanillin from cow dung. His neighbours have since stopped dropping by the house to borrow cake ingredients from him.
"Novel Production Method for Plant Polyphenol from Livestock Excrement Using Subcritical Water Reaction," Mayu Yamamoto, International Medical Center of Japan, patent pending (as is committal to the big house)

LINGUISTICS
Juan Manuel Toro, Josep B. Trobalon and Núria Sebastián-Gallés, of Universitat de Barcelona, for showing that rats sometimes cannot tell the difference between a person speaking Japanese backwards and a person speaking Dutch backwards. In a related study Dr Yobbo found that researchers from Arselona talk a lot of bollocks no matter what language they're speaking at the time, be it Catalan, Dutch, Spanish, English or gibberish.
"Effects of Backward Speech and Speaker Variability in Language Discrimination by Rats," J.M. Toro, J.B. Trobalon and N. Sebastián-Gallés, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, vol. 31, no. 1, January 2005, pp 95-100.

PEACE
The Air Force Wright Laboratory, Dayton, Ohio, USA, for instigating research & development on a chemical weapon - the so-called 'gay bomb' - that will make enemy soldiers become sexually irresistible to each other. Dropping the 'gay bomb' sounds like something one might do at the Wickham in the early hours of the AM (cue Electric Six declaring "I've got something to put IN you!")
"Harassing, Annoying, and 'Bad Guy' Identifying Chemicals," Wright Laboratory, WL/FIVR, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, June 1, 1994.

ECONOMICS
Kuo Cheng Hsieh, of Taichung, Taiwan, for patenting a device that catches bank robbers by dropping a net over them. An attempt to submit 'prior art' intellectual property of ACME Corporation and a Mr W.E. Coyote was argued as inadmissable by patent attorneys.
U.S. patent #6,219,959, granted on April 24, 2001, for a "net trapping system for capturing a robber immediately."

AVIATION
Patricia V. Agostino, Santiago A. Plano and Diego A. Golombek of Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Argentina, for their discovery that Viagra aids jetlag recovery in hamsters.
"Sildenafil Accelerates Reentrainment of Circadian Rhythms After Advancing Light Schedules," P.V. Agostino, S.A. Plano and D.A. Golombek, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 23, June 5 2007, pp. 9834-9.
Somewhat ironic that this, um, hard-hitting research ended up being published in a journal whose abbreviation is PNAS.

_____________________

Journal Club
Our favourite paper of the week is the following, the abstract for which we present utterly unedited as there's really no way we can improve on it. Yes, they're serious; and yes, they actually got this published.

Evolution and Human Behavior
28 (2007), 375 – 381
Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap dancers: economic evidence for human estrus?

Geoffrey Miller, Joshua M. Tybur, Brent D. Jordan
Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA

ABSTRACT
To see whether estrus was really “lost” during human evolution (as researchers often claim), we examined ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by professional lap dancers working in gentlemen's clubs. Eighteen dancers recorded their menstrual periods, work shifts, and
tip earnings for 60 days on a study web site. A mixed-model analysis of 296 work shifts (representing about 5300 lap dances) showed an interaction between cycle phase and hormonal contraception use. Normally cycling participants earned about US$335 per 5-h shift during estrus, US$260 per shift during the luteal phase, and US$185 per shift during menstruation. By contrast, participants using contraceptive pills showed no estrous earnings peak. These results constitute the first direct economic evidence for the existence and importance of estrus in contemporary human females, in a real-world work setting. These results have clear implications for human evolution, sexuality, and economics.

And, of course, these results have absolutely NOTHING to do with three seedy, dateless male researchers' enthusiasm for writing off nine months' worth of 'working lunches' at Santa Fe Gold and Crazy Horse as research expenses...

_____________________

A late submission for our Research Paper Of The Weak comes from Chemical Communications, the journal of the Royal Society of Chemistry (UK), via our esteemed correspondent from the materials sciences, Dr Craigos.

Electrochemical synthesis of metal and semimetal nanotube–nanowire heterojunctions and their electronic transport properties
Dachi Yang, Guowen Meng, Shuyuan Zhang, Yufeng Hao, Xiaohong An, Qing Wei, Min Ye and Lide Zhang
Chem. Commun. 2007, 1733-1735


Metal and semimetal nanotube–nanowire heterojunction arrays have been achieved by sequential electrochemical-deposition inside the nanochannels of anodic aluminium oxide template with a layer of Au thin enough to leave the pores open.

So far so dull.

Heterojunctions of one-dimensional nanostructures have received considerable attention due to their unique properties [1–3], and potential applications in nanodevices [4–8]. Previous studies on longitudinally segmented heteronanostructures have mainly focused on two segments of nanowires (NWs) [9–12], two segments of nanotubes (NTs) [13], and one segment of NTs and another segment of NWs [14–17]. For NT–NW heterostructures, the NT segments are usually carbon NTs, which have been prepared by catalytic growth [14], chemical vapor deposition [15], solid–solid reaction [16] and surface attaching methods [17]. However, little has been reported on nanoheterojunctions with one longitudinal segment consisting of metallic or semimetal NTs, which might have potential applications in future nanotechnology.


You getting all this?

Here, we demonstrate a facile approach for the building of metal and semimetal nanotube–nanowire (NT–NW) nanohetero-junction arrays by sequential electrochemical deposition of two materials inside the nanochannels of anodic aluminium oxide (AAO) template. Herein we take metal Cu and semimetal Bi as examples.
The heterojunction arrays of CuNTs...

Ah. And suddenly, the stunt goes horribly wrong.

From that point on in the text, there are no less than fifty occurrences of Derek and Clive's favourite noun, not to mention numerous carefully diagrams, complete with arrows helpfully pointing out CuNTs of interest. In describing one of the figures the authors indicate 'It can be seen that the CuNTs (marked by dashed circle III) are quite uniform with smooth surface', which suggests to me they've been airbrushed like in Playboy - Hef won't publish them any other way.

We should at this point concede that maybe English isn't the first language of this group, given they hail from the Institute of Solid State Physics at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and that rationally there is no good a priori reason why an appropriate abbreviation for 'copper nanotube' would not be 'CuNT', aside from it being the foulest curse-word in the most broadly spoken language in the world. We'll give them a pass mark on this one; quite what the fuck the English editors of the journal were up to we can't say, but one thing seems certain - the Royal Society for Chemistry are a bunch of copper nanotubes.

_____________________

At 9.30pm CET yesterday, a bunch of white lab-coated wonks buried in a super-secret compound deep under the Swiss Alps, switched on a machine designed to generate a black hole and destroy the world. It didn't work, so they're trying again next week.

Well, the doomsday device - the CERN Large Hadron Collider (as distinct from the Large Hadrian Collider, which was a truck which ran off the road in northern England and crashed into an old Roman wall - what, too obscure?) - worked pretty well, actually. About all the particle physics punishers in question actually did was to switch the thing on, align the beams, fire a few "lasers" around the track, then knocked off for beers. Despite the clamouring, embarrassing straw-man-a-thon of the media (i.e. breathlessly claiming 'World About To End In Nuclear Physics Experiment' then immediately afterwards declaring 'World Disappointingly Fails To End In Nuclear Physics Experiment'), CERN's best, brightest and deservedly single-est haven't actually smashed anything into anything yet. So there's hope yet for doomsday cults worldwide who are still trying to get over the public humiliation of that whole Y2K lead balloon, the biggest anticlimax since Jason Biggs tried to bang that exchange chick in American Pie 1.

Personally, I welcome Switzerland being turned into a black hole, a bottomless non-existant non-entity from which no light can excape and in which no life can be possible. And by 'welcome' I obviously mean 'would not actually be able to tell the difference'. And there'd bound to be pluses - Roger Federer would need a new place to hang his shingle, and since Llittle Lleyton's ggone to sshit we've been short of a decent tennis number one. Of course we'd have to stipulate on grounds of national pride that he'd be contractually prohibited from appearing in any more of those fucking punishing Gillette Mach Turbo Fusion Vibraslap Extreme Bollocks commercials with one-legged Tiger and that haughty Terry Henry git who used to play for Arsenal.

The actual point of the exercise, allegedly, is to smash tiny shit into each other at ferociously high speeds, much as most of us used to do with our Matchbox cars in kindy, in order to try and get at the most fundamental unsolved questions of the universe, like the mechanism of how gravity acts on mass, what dark matter is (other than the stuff which is used to make the griddle marks on chicken burgers), whether the Higgs Boson is truly a 'God particle' or just a highly obscure snowboarding manouevre, and why noone at CERN can manage to pull a root.

_____________________

I have been asked why I have failed to win the Nobel Prize for Medicine, and some chick has instead. I respond to this slight, though it remains clearly beneath me to do so, by pointing out that Nobel Prizes are for sucktooths and nimrods and that true science genius is motivated not by baubles and trinkets but by the pursuit of truth, clarity, understanding, and girls with big boobies. And anyway the IgNobels have more credence. They usually get a CCR tribute band to play the awards ceremony. The IgNobels, awarded by the Annals (that's ANNALS) of Improbable Research, are handed out yearly to individuals or groups that have made the greatest contribution to embarrassing, pointless or otherwise crap research in their field.

This year's crop of quote-unquote 'winners' was notably more crap than previous years, however, there was one shining beacon of fucken topsness amidst all the too-obvious played-for-laffs gongs (IgNobel Prize for Economics going to the heads of the Icelandic banks? Comedy GOLD!) - that being the IgNobel Peace Prize awarded to Stephan Bolliger, Steffen Ross, Lars Oesterhelweg, Michael Thali and Beat Kneubuehl of the University of Bern for determining whether it is better to be smashed over the head with a full bottle of beer or with an empty bottle. The findings, published in the Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine And Glassing Munters In RSL Carparks, present the slightly counterintuitive result that while full beer bottles fracture with an impact energy of 30 Joules, empty beer bottles require 40 J of energy to break. To wit, while either will likely fuck you, empty bottles will fuck you good and proper. This intriguing difference in the energy required is explainified by the authors as relating to the state of beer as being an incompressible fluid, which propagates the energy of the initial impact throughout the glass in a way that the air inside the empty bottle does not. They also implicate potential effects of compressed gas inside the full bottle, in the form of carbonation, which would also increase the pressure within the bottle. They would furthermore like to know what the fuck you're doing shooting backwards from the 'D', advised you to stop fucken looking at their missus like that, and in conclusion, asked whether you want to fucken go, ay. You poofter.

Future directions of this work relate to determining whether the findings established by Bolliger et al. are translationary to an Antipodean context, ie from large-but-fragile 500mL bottles of Feldschlossen (understood to have served as weapon of choice of the venerable Field Marshall Therbs on his Oktoberfest sortie) in a beer tent in Munich, to glassing pissed munters in the Normanby Hotel carpark with the business end of a stubbie of VB.

I love science.

The Doctor is OUT to make his stockpile of potentially deadly beer bottles even more scarily weaponriffic by pouring the contents into his face.